I
was asked to give a talk in our church congregation on Mother's Day this year.
About a minute after they asked me, I knew exactly what I wanted to speak about
- Mother Eve. I love Mother Eve. After I finished the talk I had several people
ask for a copy, so I'm posting it here on the blog. I have tried to provide
links for all of the quote sources that I could. Also, I never write out
exactly what I'm going to say in my talks, so I'm not sure exactly what I said
in between each of the quotes, but what is written here is a pretty close
approximation.
A
lot of what I've said can be found in the great book "Eve and the Choice
Made in Eden" by Beverly Campbell. It's currently out of print but you can
either buy it used or get it as an ebook.
picture by Rose Datoc Dall
|
Now,
if you are not a member of my faith, this talk is not going to make a whole lot
of sense to you, I imagine. The majority of the quotes are taken from
priesthood leaders in our church (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day
Saints). We have a different view of the Garden of Eden story than many
christian faiths in that we believe it was absolutely necessary for Adam and
Eve to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. If they hadn't
partaken, we wouldn't be here. We believe we existed as spirits in heaven
before this life on earth - spirit children of a Heavenly Father and a Heavenly
Mother - and that the plan was for us to come to earth and get bodies and see
if we would could learn to control our bodies and obey God's commandments.
Adam and Eve had to partake the fruit for us to begin our mortal journey and
make our way back to God's presence. You can read more about my faith by
reading my mormon.org
profile. And I'm always happy to answer questions.
So
here is the talk I gave on Mother's Day:
Good
morning. Happy Mother’s Day I want to say that I know mother's day can be a
painful day for us women.
-
to those who don’t yet have children
Sister
Patricia Holland said: “As I tenderly acknowledge the very real pain
that many single women, or married women who have not borne children, feel
about any discussion of motherhood, could we consider this one possibility
about our eternal female identity-“our unity in our diversity? Eve was given
the identity of “the mother of all living“—years, decades, perhaps centuries
before she ever bore a child. it would appear that her motherhood preceded her
maternity, just as surely as the perfection of the Garden preceded the
struggles of mortality. I believe mother is one of those very carefully chosen
words, one of those rich words—with meaning after meaning after meaning. We
must not, at all costs, let that word divide us. I believe with all my heart
that it is first and foremost a statement about our nature, not a head count of
our children. (Ensign, October 1987. "One Thing Needful: Becoming
Women of Greater Faith in Christ")
That’s
what I would like to talk about today – our divine role and nature, and about
our Mother Eve; because it all started with Eve. I love mother Eve. I wish we
knew more about her. But l am grateful for the additional knowledge that has been
given to us through the inspired words of modern day prophets. Eve is a type
for us, and we should all strive to be like Eve.
I
don't want this to feel like a gospel doctrine lesson, but I feel like it's
important that we understand Eve’s role in our lives, because so much of what
women suffer through is because of Eve. That sounded bad. I mean that wicked
men have been using the Garden of Eve story to put Eve in a subordinate
position to men, but with a correct view of the story we see that this was never
meant to be. Eve was never meant to be ruled over, and one of the important
parts of the restoration in these latter days is the restoration of the garden
story and what male/female relationships should be like.
So
let’s talk about Eve in the pre-existence. We know that some were chosen before
they were born for special missions here on earth. Eve was chosen as one of the
most righteous of God's children to come to earth and be the mother of all
living. Elder Bruce R. McConkie said "Eve- daughter of God, one of the
spirit offspring of the Almighty Elohim— was among the noble and great in the
preexistence. She ranked in spiritual stature, in faith and devotion, in
conformity to eternal law with Michael." (Bruce R. McConkie, "Eve
and the Fall," in Woman (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book, 1979))
Eve
was chosen because of her righteousness, just as was Michael.
After
Adam was created, the scriptures tell us "And the Lord God said, It is not
good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him."
(Genesis 2:18)
When
I read this as a child, I always thought it sounded like Eve was supposed to be
a helper, someone who was a subordinate; that she was only there to help Adam,
and that made me feel bad. I knew it was a wrong interpretation, but didn't
know what the right one was.
Biblical
scholar David Freedman tells us that the Hebrew word translated there into
English as "help" is the word ezer, which is a combination of two
roots- one meanting "to rescue, to save" and the other meaning
"to be strong“, but in time was always interpreted as "to help".
The other word used in that verse to describe Eve is k’enegdo, which means
“equal”. So it appears that with a more precise translation we can understand
better the intended role of Mother Eve. Genesis 2:18 would then read "it
is not good that man should be alone. I will make him a companion of strength
and power who is equal with him.”
This
more accurate understanding of the original words coincides with what the
restored gospel has taught us about Mother Eve. President Howard W. Hunter
taught; “The Lord intended that the wife he a help meet for man (meet means
equal) - that is, a companion equal and necessary in partnership."("Being a Righteous Husband and Father, General
Conference, October 1994)
And
Elder Earl C. Tingey said “you must not misunderstand what the Lord meant
when Adam was told he was to have a helpmeet. A helpmeet is a companion suited
to or equal to us. We walk side by side with a helpmeet, not one before or
behind the other. A helpmeet results in an absolute equal partnership between a
husband and a wife. Eve was to be equal to Adam as a husband and wife are to be
equal to each other." ("The Simple Truths From Heaven: The Lord's
Pattern" CES Fireside, 2008)
After
they were placed in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve were given two
commandments. The first, to multiply and replenish the earth. The second was
that they were not to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and
evil, but then He added “nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it
is given unto thee;“
So
we see that this command is different. It's more of a warning.
While
Adam and Eve were there in the garden, they didn’t just walk around picking
fruit and petting the animals. They were learning. Joseph Smith taught
"Adam received commandments and instructions from God: this was the order
form the beginning.” (History of the Church, 4:207–9;
from a discourse prepared by Joseph Smith and read at a Church conference held
on Oct. 5, 1840, in Nauvoo, Illinois. Can be found in the Joseph Smith Manual,
Chapter 8) Brigham
young added that "Adam was as conversant with his Father who placed him
upon this earth as we are conversant with our earthly parents.“ (can be found in
Teachings of Brigham Young Manual, chapter 14) So we
know that they were being taught in the way we all are taught, line upon line,
precept upon precept.
Eve
was aware of her calling to be the “Mother of all Living" from the
beginning, she was just not aware of how that was going to happen. They must
have pondered this. Hugh Nibley suggested that by the time thy were tempted by
the being who symbolically is called a sperent, Adam and Eve had concluded that
they must partake of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
This
to me is the critical question. Did Eve understand what she was doing? Yes, she
did! President James E. Faust said: "We all owe a great debt of
gratitude to Eve. In the Garden of Eden, she and Adam were instructed not to
eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. However, they were also
reminded, "Thou mayest choose for thyself." The choice was really between
a continuation of their comfortable existence in Eden, where they would never
progress, or a momentous exit into mortality with its opposites: pain, trials,
and physical death in contrast to joy, growth, and the potential for eternal
life. In contemplating this choice, we are told, “And when the woman saw that
the tree was good for food, and a tree to be desired to make her wise, she took
of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and also gave unto her husband with her, and
he did eat." And thus began their earthly probation and parenthood.” (General Conference October 1999,
"What if Means to Be a Daughter of God")
She
knew she could stay in the garden forever, with her husband, enjoying being in
God's presence and living a life of ease. But she also was aware of her role as
mother, and taking thought of all the souls waiting to come to earth through
her, she chose to leave her life of ease. Speaking to women, Elder Jeffrey R.
Holland said in a conference talk in 1997: "Yours is the grand
tradition of Eve, the mother of all the human family, the one who understood
that she and Adam had to fall in order that ‘men [and women] might be’ and that
there would be joy." (General Conference April 1997,
"Because She is a Mother")
She
understood that they needed to eat the fruit. She understood that it was a
necessary step. She wasn’t tricked into it. It wasn’t a fortunate mistake. It
was necessary. It had to he a true exercise of agency. The choice couldn't be
made in ignorance. Elder Boyd K. Packer explained that "there was too
much at issue to introduce man into mortality by force. That would contravene
the very law essential to the plan."(General Conference April 1988,
"Atonement, Agency, Accountability") Elder
John A. Widtsoe elaborated on the agency that had to prevail in the garden: "The
eternal power of choice was respected by the Lord himself . . .It really
converts the command into a warning, as much as if to say, if you do this
thing, you will bring upon yourself a certain punishment, but do it if you
choose . . .
The
Lord had warned Adam and Eve of the hard battle with earth conditions if they
chose to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He would not
subject his son and daughter to hardship and the death of their bodies unless
it be of their own choice. They must choose for themselves. They chose wisely,
in accord with the heavenly law of love fore others." (John A. Widtsoe, Evidences and Reconciliations,
Arranged by G. Homer Durham. 3 vols in 1. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1960)
Now
the next question is, was Eve punished for partaking of the fruit? She was not
punished by God. Wicked men have been punishing women for ages, relegating them
to second class status, but that was never God's design. The scriptures say
that Eve was told: "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy
sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy
desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.’ The Hebrew word
rendered "sorrow" (Gen. does not connote "sadness," but
"labor," or "sweat," or "pain."' And multiply
does not mean make greater, but instead repeatedly. She will repeatedly labor to
bring forth children. And then there's the "he shall rule over thee” part.
Elder Bruce C. Hafen points out that the "over" is from the Hebrew
word “bet” and means "with". So it should read that Adam rules
"with" Eve, not "over”. He is not punishing Eve. God is telling her
what is going to happen next. He is teaching her, as He teaches Adam what will
happen to him in laboring for food. (Ensign August 2007, "Crossing Thresholds and Becoming Equal Partners")
Elder
Bruce C. Hafen said “The incorrect idea in Christian history that wives
should be dependent began with the false premise that the fall of Adam and Eve
was a tragic mistake and that Eve was the primary culprit. Thus women's
traditional submission to men was considered a fair punishment for Eve's sin.
Thankfully, the Restoration clarifies Eve's -- and Adam's -- choice as
essential to the eternal progression of God's children. We honor rather than
condemn what they did, and we see Adam and Eve as equal partners.” (Ensign August 2007, "Crossing Thresholds and
Becoming Equal Partners")
I
am so grateful for the restored gospel that helps put Eve, and all her
daughters, back where she should be. Women have had a rough existence on this
earth, and still do in many parts of the world. President Gordon B. Hinckley
recognized this when he said “Eve became God's final creation, the grand
summation of all of the marvelous work that had gone before. Notwithstanding
this preeminence given the creation of woman, she has so frequently through the
ages been relegated to a secondary position. She has been put down. She has
been denigrated. She has been enslaved. She has been abused.” (General Conference October 2004,
"The Women in Our Lives")
This
surely makes our Heavenly Parents grieve. Eve gave us a gift. We are here
because of her and I love her and am grateful for the choice and sacrifice she
made.
Before
I finish, I want to point out the oneness of Adam and Eve, because I think it’s
a wonderful reminder of what we are striving for in our marriages. The
scriptures tell us the following:
“8
In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;
9
In the image of his own body, male and female, created he them, and blessed
them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created and became
living souls in the land upon the footstool of God." (Moses 6:8-9)
He
called “their name Adam.” Adam and Eve together make the family unit known as
Adam. They are one flesh, and that’s what we should be striving for in our
marriages. Bruce R. McConkie explained "The name of Adam and Eve
as a united partnership is Adam. They, the two of them together, are named
Adam. This is more that the man Adam as a son of God or the woman Eve as a
daughter of the same Holy Being. Adam and Eve taken together are named Adam,
and the fall of Adam is the fall of them both, for they are one."
Isn’t
that wonderful! I love the thought. Let me show you another wonderful thing.
Going
back to the scripture, you notice also that this oneness of husband and wife is
evident in the term “God” as well. Let me read it again. “in the likeness of
God made he him; In the image of his own body, male and female, created he
them.” We are created in the image of God, which is both male and female.
We know that our Heavenly Father is male, and we know that our Heavenly Mother
is female. The two of them together are known to us as “God”.
Elder
Erastus Snow, an apostle from 1849 to 1888 said the following:
“What,”
says one, “do you mean we should understand that Deity consists of man and
Woman?" Most certainly I do. If I believe anything that God has ever said
about himself. . . I must believe that deity consists of man and woman . . .
there can be no God except he is composed of the man and woman united, and
there is not in all the eternities that exist, or ever will be a God in any
other way."(Discourse delivered in 1878, journal of discourses)
And
that is pretty revolutionary thinking, don't you think?
And
I haven't spoken yet about our Heavenly Mother. We do not know much about her,
but we know she exists. We can assume she is one in purpose with our Heavenly
Father, and that she loves us just as much.
Elder
Glenn L. Pace said “Sisters, I testify that when you stand in front of your
Heavenly Parents in those royal courts on high and you look into Her eyes and
behold Her countenance, any question you ever had about the role of women in
the kingdom will evaporate into the rich celestial air, because at that moment
you will see standing directly in front of you, your divine nature and
destiny."(BYU devotional, March 2010, "The
Divine Nature and Destiny of Women)
Women,
you are loved. So loved. We are not perfect, none of us are, but we are
valuable. And what makes us valuable? Is it how well we keep a home? Or how
beautiful we are? Or how righteous we are? Nope. We are valuable because we are
daughters of God, and we are of infinite worth to our Heavenly Parents.
(Also,
lds women, you should check out this article about the Two Trees, because
personally I think it makes a lot of sense and is just full of beautiful
thoughts.)
It's a great talk! Thanks for sharing. I love the idea of God comprising Heavenly Father and heavenly mother. That's awesome.
ReplyDeletethanks Emily. Isn't that a great thought?
DeleteMarvelous talk, Erin--thank you for posting this! I am sharing it with our rabbi friend in New Rochelle, NY, Amiel Wohl. I once heard a feminist in his congregation expound on her belief that the ancient Hebrew references involved a God with both male and female characteristics. She didn't quite capture the idea that they were two separate beings, but she certainly made a case for there being such a thing as feminine deity. I love our concept that we have a Heavenly Mother and my belief that we don't know more about her because our Father in Heaven didn't want her name dragged through the mud, as is His name. Especially on Mother's Day I try to set aside time to think on her and ways I can change to become more like her and ask Heavenly Father to let her know I'm thinking of her. --Aunt Sherlene
DeleteGreat talk Erin! This really helps me look at things in a light that I have never thought of before.
ReplyDeleteMaybe you'll start treating your wife better . . . jk
DeleteActually, Jason always says I'm the boss, so maybe our pendulum needs to swing the other way.
Thanks, Erin, for sharing those wonderful thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThank you for reading and commenting.
DeleteLovely. Just lovely. Thank you for sharing!
ReplyDeleteThanks Hannah!
Delete